capa-and-aiag’s-cqi-20-–-effective-problem-solving

CAPA and AIAG’s CQI-20 – Effective Problem Solving

Live Webinar

  • 90 minutes
  • 13 Days Left
     Jun 17, 2020
  •   01:00 PM - 02:30 PM ET
    10:00 AM - 11:30 AM PT

Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) plays a central role in quality management systems. Its customer and supplier processes include far more than just control of nonconformance; they also include customer feedback, audit findings, the management review, and even more. Inadequate CAPA is the the predominant source of ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 audit findings and FDA Form 483 observations. Inadequate CAPA leaves problems unresolved which leads in turn to even more audit findings as well as waste associated with the problems in question.

The Automotive Industry Action Group’s (AIAG’s) CQI-20, Effective Problem Solving, is, however, a recognized, off-the-shelf, and highly effective CAPA process that can address all seven Toyota production system wastes, as opposed to just poor quality.

When formal CAPA is too complex for an issue that can be resolved on the shop floor by the process owner, a simplified and generally accepted the approach can be used instead.

Join this session by expert speaker Bill Levinson where he will discuss the ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 audit findings, and FDA Form 483 observations, support requirements for CAPA, an overview of the similar 8D (Eight Disciplines) approach, up-to-date CAPA techniques, CQI-20: Effective Problem Solving Guide and more


Session Highlights:

1.   CAPA is arguably the most important process in quality management system because of the resolution of issues related not only to poor quality but also audit findings, customer complaints, opportunities for improvement, and inputs and outputs of the management review meeting depends on it.

o    Inadequate CAPA and root cause analysis is a predominant source of ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 audit findings, and FDA Form 483 observations.

2.    CAPA has related traditionally to poor quality and its prevention, but it is applicable to any of the TPS’s Seven Wastes. The waste is treated like nonconformance or, more specifically, a gap between the current performance state and an achievable performance state. AIAG’s CQI-20 uses the phrase, “what should be but is not being met.” The CAPA process then identifies the root cause, and then implements, verifies, and deploys a solution in the usual manner.

o    It is to be noted that poor quality, the traditional focus of CAPA, is the only TPS waste that announces its presence. The other six are usually asymptomatic, are built into the job, and can often be far more costly than poor quality. As but one example, bricklaying, as practiced for thousands of years, wasted 64 percent of the workers’ labor until the early 20th century.

o    Audit findings and management review outputs also can invoke the CAPA process to resolve the issues in question.

3.    Organizational support requirements for CAPA (per CQI-20, Effective Problem Solving)

o    This includes a culture of problem-solving.

4.    Automotive Industry Action Group. 2018. CQI-20: Effective Problem Solving Guide is a comprehensive, widely recognized, and highly effective off the shelf process. It and the related 8D (Eight Disciplines) process, is arguably more effective than Six Sigma’s DMAIC process and applies to a wider variety of problems.

o    Awareness of the problem; this can be extended to the other six TPS wastes as well

o    Cross-functional team

o    Definition of the problem

o    Containment of the problem; containment is not, however, correction.

o    Identify the root cause(s): (1) Occurrence root cause: why the problem occurred. (2) Escape root cause: why the problem was not caught. (3) Systemic root cause: why the system or planning process did not identify these issues ahead of time

o    Select and test the corrective action(s)

o    Implement the corrective actions

o    Prevent the recurrence of the problem. This includes the deployment of the lessons learned to related processes that might benefit from the knowledge.

o    Recognize the team

o    Simple examples will be presented.

5.    Formal CAPA processes are, however, too complicated and time consuming for issues that can be resolved on the shop floor. The hatto (“recognition” or “awareness”), or error cause removal (ECR) process from Halpin’s (1966) Zero Defects empowers front-line workers and others to identify potential quality, safety, or waste-related issues that the owner of the activity—the person with the resources and authority necessary to implement a solution—can deploy quickly.

o    Poka Hatto (“awareness of opportunities for error”) relates to quality, although it encompasses root causes other than an error as well.

o    Hiyari hatto (“experience of almost accident situation,” with hiyari meaning “incident”) relates to safety. This is an occupational health and safety near-miss report. This supports ISO 45001’s clauses on workforce participation, and also the right of employees to report safety issues.

o    Muda Hatto (“recognition of waste”) means recognition of one of the other six TPS wastes. Workers might suddenly realize, for example, that a poor job design wastes 50% or more of their labor or that scrap from machining operations along with consumables that are thrown away are forms of waste.

o    Hatto or ECR must consider, however, whether management of change (MOC) issues are involved. We never want our process to generate “new” or “changed” outputs for our internal or external customers without review for potential unintended consequences. Installation of a machine guard or error-proofing (poka-yoke) device is unlikely to do this, but a change in materials, methods, machines, and so on could. If MOC is an issue, the project must be handed off to the formal cross-functional CAPA process which assesses changes for unintended consequences.

o    Simple examples will be presented.

Attendees will receive a pdf copy of the slides and accompanying notes for the presentation, as well as an appendix that describes the 8D process.


Why You Should Attend:

The Automotive Industry Action Group's Effective Problem Solving (CQI-20) is, however, a comprehensive, generally accepted, and extremely effective off-the-shelf CAPA process. This webinar will cover the highlights of CQI-20 and the handout (slides and notes) will also provide an overview of the similar 8D (Eight Disciplines) approach. Both can be deployed against not just poor quality, but also against any other waste (Muda) if the waste is treated as a gap between current and desired performance. Attendees will learn up-to-date CAPA techniques including considerations such as the need to look for three root causes (occurrence, escape, and systemic) rather than just one.

The webinar will also offer a much simpler CAPA process that can be used by a process owner when the issue or opportunity can be resolved on the shop floor without the need for a cross-functional team or extensive root cause investigation. This empowers the entire workforce (and other stakeholders) to contribute to the removal of all forms of waste from the organization, which enables lower prices, higher wages, and higher profits simultaneously.

Who Should Attend:

  • Quality Departments

  • Manufacturing Departments

  • Engineering Departments

  • Production Departments

*You may ask your Question directly to our expert during the Q&A session.
** You can buy On-Demand and view it as per your convenience.



William Levinson

William Levinson

William A. Levinson, P.E., is the principal of Levinson Productivity Systems, P.C. He is an ASQ Fellow, Certified Quality Engineer, Quality Auditor, Quality Manager, Reliability Engineer, and Six Sigma Black Belt. He holds degrees in chemistry and chemical engineering from Penn State and Cornell Universities, and night school degrees in business administration and applied statistics from Union College, and he has given presentations at the ASQ World Conference, TOC World 2004, and other national conferences on productivity and quality.

Levinson is also the author of several books on quality, productivity, and management. Henry Ford's Lean Vision is a comprehensive overview of the lean manufacturing and organizational management methods that Ford employed to achieve unprecedented bottom line results, and Beyond the Theory of Constraints describes how Ford's elimination of variation from material transfer and processing times allowed him to come close to running a balanced factory at full capacity. Statistical Process Control for Real-World Applications shows what to do when the process doesn't conform to the traditional bell curve assumption.

No Reviews Found

Want to attend in a Group? Call 844-810-1151 and Save upto 50%

  • $125.00

  • $199.00

  • $199.00

  • $279.00

  • $125.00

  • $125.00

  • $199.00

  • Total : $00.00

Share this course with a friend
           

We Also Recommend

Manufacturing

Sample Size Determination for Design Validation Activities

Pre Recorded
STEVEN WACHS
(Speaker)
Duration:
75 minutes

Manufacturing

Stability Studies and Estimating Shelf Life with Regression Model

Live Webinar
STEVEN WACHS
(Speaker)
Date:
Jun 19, 2020
Start Time:
01:00 PM (ET) | 10:00 AM (PT)
Duration:
90 minutes

Newsletter

Get Notified about News, Webinars, Community & More