Many types of statistical analyses assume that the underlying raw data follow a Normal Distribution. Common examples include Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), t-tests, F tests, and Process Capability analyses using Normal methods. It is important to test the assumption of normality before using methods that require it.
Next, several methods for testing data for normality are presented. Although some older techniques are referenced, we emphasize the use of probability plotting and goodness-of-fit tests to provide objective assessments of normality. We also discuss the risks of making errors in hypothesis tests and how to control those risks.
We provide several common scenarios that lead to the rejection of normality. An understanding of these situations is important for determining appropriate actions when a normality test fails. We discuss outliers, unstable processes, and issues caused by discreteness in the data. Next, we discuss some of the common types of goodness-of-fit tests that may be used (e.g. Andersen-Darling, Kolmogorov Smirnoff, etc.).
Join this session by expert speaker Steven Wachs, where he will discuss probability distributions and the Normal (Gaussian) Distribution specifically. The key characteristics and distribution parameters that define the normal model are discussed in the introduction. The concept of distribution model fitting is presented and reasons for normality testing are reviewed.
Session Highlights:
Understand the Normal Distribution and how it is characterized
Know when normality testing is important to
Apply probability plotting and goodness-of-fit tests for testing normality of the data
Interpret graphical results and p-values from normality testing
Diagnose why normality tests fail to
Understand the differences between some of the common goodness-of-fit tests
Determine appropriate sample sizes for normality testing
Perform and interpret outlier tests
Understand the justification for excluding data from normality tests
Why You Should Attend:
By attending this webinar you will be able to understand the following:
In-Depth Treatment of Normality Testing
Focus on Effective Application of the Techniques
Improve your Ability to Conduct, Interpret, and Explain Test Results
Normality Testing Methods
Reasons for Rejecting Normality
Who Should Attend?
Data Analysts
Quality Engineering or Quality Assurance Personnel
Product Design and Development personnel
Manufacturing personnel
Supplier Quality personnel
Process Engineers
Six Sigma Green Belts or Black Belts
Scientists
R&D Personnel
*You may ask your Question directly to our expert during the Q&A session.
** You can buy On-Demand and view it at your convenience.
Steven Wachs
Steven Wachs has 25 years of wide-ranging industry experience in both technical and management positions. Steve has worked as a statistician at Ford Motor Company where he has extensive experience in the development of statistical models, reliability analysis, designed experimentation, and statistical process control.
Steve is currently a Principal Statistician at Integral Concepts, Inc. where he assists manufacturers in the application of statistical methods to reduce variation and improve quality and productivity. He also possesses expertise in the application of reliability methods to achieve robust and reliable products as well as to estimate and reduce warranty. In addition to providing consulting services, Steve regularly conducts workshops in industrial statistical methods for companies worldwide.