schedule-delay-analysis-–-choosing-a-method-why-you-get-different-results

Schedule Delay Analysis – Choosing A Method & Why You Get Different Results

Live Webinar

  • 90 minutes

There are numerous Forensic Schedule Analysis Methods that can be used to quantify delays that occurred during a project. Many construction industry practitioners profess that schedule delay analysis is subject to too much judgment that only a Delay Analyst can do. Many consider Delay analysis unreliable and inaccurate. This webinar sets forth the factors that Delay Analysts and Construction Attorneys need to consider when selecting a Forensic Scheduling Methodology and why these factors are so important to the initial choice of method.

Additionally, the webinar will clearly explain why different methods, relying on the same project records, can end up with different conclusions. This results not from excessive judgment on the part of the analyst, but rather on the way the various forensic schedule methods operate.

Join this session by expert speaker James Zack, where he will discuss the different methods of Schedule Delay Analysis and what causes different results.


Session Highlights:

  • What is a forensic schedule analysis?

  • What types of schedule delay analysis exist and how do they differ?

  • How do you choose a schedule delay analysis method?

  • What factors and issues should be addressed before committing to a potentially lengthy and expensive process?

  • Is the choice of delay analysis methods irrevocable once made?

  • What is the risk of trying to change methods in mid-stream?

  • Why do different delay analysis methods yield different results?

  • The presenter will provide answers and insights concerning these issues and highlight the 11 factors a forensic scheduler should consider when making a choice.


Why You Should Attend:

By attending this webinar, the attendees will learn the common methods of Schedule Delay Analysis, their strengths, and their weaknesses. You will get to know the factors that need to be considered when selecting a method and the risks of trying to change Delay Analysis Methodologies during the life of the dispute. Finally, the webinar explains why different delay analysis methods end up producing different results in spite of being based on the same project records and documents.


Who Should Attend:

  • Project owners and their representatives

  • Construction Managers

  • Program managers

  • Contractors

  • Subcontractors

  • Design professionals

  • Attorneys for all project participants
  • Delay Analysis


*You may ask your Question directly to our expert during the Q&A session.
** You can buy On-Demand and view it at your convenience.


James Zack

James Zack

James is the Senior Advisor to the Navigant Construction Forum™. The Forum strives to be the construction industry’s resource for thought leadership and best practices on avoidance and resolution of construction project disputes globally. Formerly, he was the Executive Director, Corporate Claims Management Group, Fluor Corporation, one of the world’s largest EPCM contractors.

James was previously Vice President of PinnacleOne and the Executive Director of the PinnacleOne Institute and a Senior Construction Claims Consultant for CH2M HILL, Inc. Jim has, for more than 45 years, worked on both private and public projects throughout the United States and in 28 countries abroad. James is a Fellow of AACE, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, and the International Guild of Project Controls. In the construction claims field, he is a recognized and published expert in mitigation, analysis and resolution or defense of construction claims and disputes. James is a Certified Construction Manager (CCM), a Certified Forensic Claims Consultant (CFCC) and a Project Management Professional (PMP).

No Reviews Found

Want to attend in a Group? Call 844-810-1151 and Save upto 50%

Share this course with a friend
           

Newsletter

Get Notified about News, Webinars, Community & More